INGOs in the mirror: Critical reflections of practitioners implementing psychosocial support programs

The purpose of this qualitative research is to learn from the professional wisdom of practitioners involved in implementing school-based psychosocial support in conflict-affected contexts. Practitioners from four different International Non-governmental Organizations (INGO) working in three different contexts—the Congo Basin region, the South Asia region, and the Sudan region—reflect on the concepts and realities of the psychosocial support program models utilized by their organizations. A theme emerging from these interviews is the approach to psychosocial support has the potential to do harm. The practitioners provide tangible examples of ways in which harm may occur and their possible causes. These causes include the lack of a formal venue for practitioners’ critical reflection within their organizations, internal disagreements between Child Protection and Education departments, an aid architecture that can foster competition between INGOs for funding, and the lack of commitment or organizational capacity to valorize local knowledge. This examination concludes with considerations for INGOs to reduce the potential harm caused by school-based psychosocial support programs in conflict-affected contexts.

Keywords: Psychosocial Support, Education in Emergencies, Conflict, Do No Harm, Well- being, Child Protection, Mental Health and Psychosocial Support

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.